On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:41:10AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I think that this remark is a bit unfair. When it comes to any patch > in the commit fest, and I have managed a couple of them over the > years, I have tried to keep a neutral view for all of them, meaning > that I only let the numbers speak by themselves, mostly: > - When has a patch lastly been updated. > - What's the current state in the CF app If the patch had no reviews > and still in "Needs review", simply switch it to "waiting on author".
Sorry, forgot to mention here that this is in the case where a patch does not apply anymore or that the CF bot complains, requiring a check of the patch from the author. > If the patch has been waiting on author for more than two weeks, it > would get marked as RwF at the end of the CF. There are also cases > where the status of the patch is incorrect, mostly that a patch > waiting on author because of a review was not updated as such in the > CF app. In this case, and in the middle of a CF, this would get get > marked as Rwf, but the author would get a reminder of that. Last sentence here is incorrect as well: s/get get/not get/, and the author would be reminded to update his/her patch. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
