> On 3 Sep 2020, at 12:19, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 09:47:07AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> I think this version is a clear improvement. Nothing more sticks out from a >> read-through. > > Thanks for taking the time to look at it, Daniel. We of course could > still try to figure out how we could group all dependencies without > worrying about their type, but I'd like to leave that as future work > for now. This is much more complex than what's proposed on this > thread, and I am not sure if we really need to make this stuff more > complex for this purpose.
Agreed, I think that's a separate piece of work and discussion. cheers ./daniel
