On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 10:15:37AM +0200, Dmitry Dolgov wrote: > Thanks for the patch. It sounds right, so no objections from me. But I > wonder if something similar has to be done also for > index_concurrently_swap function?
As of index.c, this already happens:
/* Preserve indisreplident in the new index */
newIndexForm->indisreplident = oldIndexForm->indisreplident;
oldIndexForm->indisreplident = false;
In short, the new concurrent index is created first with
indisreplident = false, and when swapping the old and new indexes, the
new index inherits the setting of the old one, and the old one planned
for drop uses indisreplident = false when swapping.
--
Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
