> On 8 Apr 2020, at 14:58, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote: > > On 3/28/20 5:27 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote: >> Hello Tom, >> Thanks for your feedback, >>>> I'd be rather unclear about what the actual feedback is, though. I'd >>>> interpret it as "pg does not care much about code coverage". Most clients >>>> are in the red on coverage.postgresql.org. I'd like pgbench at least to be >>>> in the green, but it does not look that it will ever be the case. >>> The reason why the first iteration failed was that it was insufficiently >>> insensitive to timing. > > This patch has been marked Returned with Feedback. > > If the TAP tests could be made to work without the special exceptions added > to pgbench.c I think this patch would have a better chance.
Turns out it wasn't, but I'm doing that now since this has been stalled since. cheers ./daniel
