On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 12:17 PM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > CopyReadFromRawBuf as a name for the new function might be misleading > > as long as we are only using it for binary data. Maybe > > CopyReadBinaryData is more appropriate? See attached v4 with these > > and a few other cosmetic changes. > > > > CopyReadBinaryData() looks meaningful. +1.
Okay, thanks. Let's have a committer take a look at this then? -- Amit Langote EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
