> On Jul 10, 2020, at 9:44 PM, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 10:00:47PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> There are two patches on this thread v2-0001 being much smaller than >> v2-0002. I have looked at 0001 for now, and, like Alvaro, this >> renaming makes sense to me. Those commands work on objects that are >> relkinds, except for one OBJECT_TYPE. So, let's get 0001 patch >> merged. Any objections from others? > > I have been through this one again and applied it as cc35d89. > -- > Michael Thanks for committing! — Mark Dilger EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
- Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of... Daniel Gustafsson
- Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate u... Mark Dilger
- Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropria... Michael Paquier
- Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappro... Michael Paquier
- Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up ina... Mark Dilger
- Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate u... Michael Paquier
- Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropria... Mark Dilger
- Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappro... Tom Lane
- Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up ina... Michael Paquier
- Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate u... Alvaro Herrera
- Refactoring relkind as an enum Mark Dilger