Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2020-Jul-08, Tom Lane wrote: >> The buildfarm's sparc64 members seem unhappy with this.
> Hmm. Some of them are, yeah, but it's not universal. For example > mussurana and ibisbill are not showing failures. Ah, right, I was thinking they hadn't run since this commit, but they have. > Anyway the error is pretty strange: only GetWALAvailability is showing a > problem, but the size calculation in the view function def is returning > a negative number, as expected. We've previously noted what seem to be compiler optimization bugs on both sparc32 and sparc64; the latest thread about that is https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f28f842d-e82b-4e30-a81a-2a1f9fa4a8e1%40www.fastmail.com This is looking uncomfortably like the same thing. Tom, could you experiment with different -O levels on those animals? regards, tom lane
