On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 5:19 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Concretely, I now propose the attached, which seems entirely > safe to back-patch.
The patch looks good to me. And +1 for back-patching. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 5:19 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Concretely, I now propose the attached, which seems entirely > safe to back-patch.
The patch looks good to me. And +1 for back-patching. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita