Pavel Borisov <pashkin.e...@gmail.com> writes:
> чт, 2 июл. 2020 г. в 19:38, Artur Zakirov <zaar...@gmail.com>:
>> So it seems we are losing some results with RUM as well.
> For me it is 100% predictable that unmodified RUM is still losing results
> as it is still using binary callback.
Right, that's in line with what I expected as well.
> The main my goal of saving binary legacy callback is that side callers like
> RUM will not break immediately but remain in
> existing state (i.e. losing results in some queries).
I don't really see why that should be a goal here. I think a forced
compile error, calling attention to the fact that there's something
to fix, is a good thing as long as we do it in a major release.
regards, tom lane
