st 1. 7. 2020 v 22:31 odesÃlatel Vik Fearing <v...@postgresfriends.org> napsal:
> On 7/1/20 9:32 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > st 1. 7. 2020 v 20:19 odesÃlatel Vik Fearing <v...@postgresfriends.org> > > napsal: > > > >> On 7/1/20 3:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > >>> I actually don't have a very clear idea of what the standard has to > >>> say about SQL-language functions. Does it just say it's a list of > >>> statements, or does it involve variables and control-flow constructs > >>> and stuff like that, too? > >> > >> > >> It's either a single sql statement, or a collection of them between > >> "begin atomic" and "end". There are no variables or flow control > >> constructs or anything like that, just as there are no such things > >> outside of a function. > >> > > > > What is the source of this comment? > > > The SQL Standard. > The SQL Standard is really big, and is very possible so I miss this part. Can you send me a link? Regards Pavel > > > Maybe we are speaking (and thinking) > > about different languages. > > > I think so, yes. > > > > I thought the language of SQL functions (ANSI/SQL) is SQL/PSM. > > > That is something else entirely, and not at all what Peter's patch is > about. > -- > Vik Fearing >