On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 8:42 AM James Coleman <jtc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yesterday I'd replied [1] to Justin's proposal for this WRT > incremental sort and expressed my opinion that including both > unnecessarily (i.e., including disk when an in-memory sort was used) > is undesirable and confusing and leads to shortcuts I believe to be > bad habits when using the data programmatically.
+1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
