Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:41:17AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Maybe I'm just used to the names, but I find that things like
>> "enable_seqscan" and "enable_nestloop" are pretty readable.
>> Once they get longer, though, not so much. So I agree with
>> renaming enable_incrementalsort.
> I think the big problem is that, without the extra underscore, it reads
> as increment-alsort. ;-)
Yeah, the longer the name gets, the harder it is to see where the
word boundaries are.
regards, tom lane
