On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 09:05:32AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 8:26 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
I suggest to rename enable_incrementalsort to enable_incremental_sort.
This is obviously more readable and also how we have named recently
added multiword planner parameters.
See attached patch.
+1, this is a way better name (and patch LGTM on REL_13_STABLE).
The reason why I kept the single-word variant is consistency with other
GUCs that affect planning, like enable_indexscan, enable_hashjoin and
many others.
That being said, I'm not particularly attached this choice, so if you
think this is better I'm OK with it.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
