> On Jun 2, 2020, at 9:58 AM, Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Mar 4, 2020, at 7:43 PM, Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hackers,
>> 
>> as mentioned in [1], I have created an implementation of command counter 
>> statistics very similar in purpose to the one already pending in the 
>> commitfest going by the name "pg_stat_sql".  I don't really care if this 
>> implementation is seen as building on that one or as separate, but I was 
>> worried about hijacking that thread, so I'm starting this thead. There are 
>> elements of this patch that borrowed from that one, so if this is accepted, 
>> authorship should reflect that.
>> 
>> See the work by Haribabu Kommi (haribabu) at 
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/27/790/
>> 
>> The two main differences are that
>> 
>> (1) This implementation is based on commandtags as enums, not strings and
>> (2) This implementation uses techniques to reduce lock contention
>> 
>> I think (2) is the more important part.
>> 
>> [1] 
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/28F46159-3764-421B-904B-004DEA339310%40enterprisedb.com
>> 
>> <v1-0001-Implementing-the-cmdstats-subsystem.patch>
>> —
> 
> Rebased patch against master caa3c4242cf86322e2ed0c86199e6462a2c41565.


Attachment: v2-0001-Implementing-the-cmdstats-subsystem.patch
Description: Binary data

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



Reply via email to