> On Mar 4, 2020, at 7:43 PM, Mark Dilger <mark.dil...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> 
> Hackers,
> 
> as mentioned in [1], I have created an implementation of command counter 
> statistics very similar in purpose to the one already pending in the 
> commitfest going by the name "pg_stat_sql".  I don't really care if this 
> implementation is seen as building on that one or as separate, but I was 
> worried about hijacking that thread, so I'm starting this thead.  There are 
> elements of this patch that borrowed from that one, so if this is accepted, 
> authorship should reflect that.
> 
> See the work by Haribabu Kommi (haribabu) at 
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/27/790/
> 
> The two main differences are that
> 
> (1) This implementation is based on commandtags as enums, not strings and
> (2) This implementation uses techniques to reduce lock contention
> 
> I think (2) is the more important part.
> 
> [1] 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/28F46159-3764-421B-904B-004DEA339310%40enterprisedb.com
> 
> <v1-0001-Implementing-the-cmdstats-subsystem.patch>
> —

Rebased patch against master caa3c4242cf86322e2ed0c86199e6462a2c41565.

Attachment: v1-0001-Implementing-the-cmdstats-subsystem.patch
Description: Binary data


—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



Reply via email to