On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:52 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > (BTW, adding an option for auto-rollback wouldn't change my opinion > about that. Not all side-effects of a query can be rolled back. Thus, > if there is an auto-rollback option, it mustn't be GUC-adjustable > either.) >
Yeah, I've worked myself around to that as well, this thread's proposal would be to just make setting up rollback more obvious and easier for a user of explain analyze - whose value at this point is wholly independent of the GUC discussion. David J.
