At Thu, 28 May 2020 16:22:33 +0900, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote in > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:07:04AM +0300, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote: > > The CI history shows that HEAD was good at 11 May 13:27 UTC, and it became > > bad by 19 May 14:00 UTC, > > so the regression was introduced somewhere in-between. > > > > Does that ring any bells? > > It does, thanks! This would map with 1d374302 or 850196b6 that > reworked this area of the code, so it seems like we are not quite done > with this work yet. Do you still see the problem as of 55ca50d > (today's latest HEAD)?
I think that's not the case. I think I cause this crash with the HEAD. I'll post a fix soon. > Also, just wondering.. If I use more or less the same commands as > your travis job I should be able to reproduce the problem with a fresh > JDBC repository, right? Or do you a sub-portion of your regression > tests to run that easily? Pgjdbc seems initiating physical replication on a logical replication session. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
