On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 09:07:04AM +0300, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote: > The CI history shows that HEAD was good at 11 May 13:27 UTC, and it became > bad by 19 May 14:00 UTC, > so the regression was introduced somewhere in-between. > > Does that ring any bells?
It does, thanks! This would map with 1d374302 or 850196b6 that reworked this area of the code, so it seems like we are not quite done with this work yet. Do you still see the problem as of 55ca50d (today's latest HEAD)? Also, just wondering.. If I use more or less the same commands as your travis job I should be able to reproduce the problem with a fresh JDBC repository, right? Or do you a sub-portion of your regression tests to run that easily? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
