Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr.shul...@zalando.de> writes:
> Would it be premature to complain about the not-that-great look of Table
> 9.1 now?
> Compare the two attached images: the screenshot from
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-comparison.html
> vs the GIMP-assisted pipe dream of mine to align it to the right edge of
> the table cell.
Hmph. I experimented with the attached patch, but at least in my browser
it only reduces the spacing inconsistency, it doesn't eliminate it.
And from a semantic standpoint, this is not nice markup.
Doing better would require substantial foolery with sub-columns and I'm
not even sure that it's possible to fix that way. (We don't have huge
control over inter-column spacing, I don't think.)
On the whole, if this is our worst table problem, I'm happy ;-)
regards, tom lane
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
index d9b3598..557a3ac 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ repeat('Pg', 4) <returnvalue>PgPgPgPg</returnvalue>
<tbody>
<row>
<entry>
- <replaceable>datatype</replaceable> <literal><</literal> <replaceable>datatype</replaceable>
+ <replaceable>datatype</replaceable> <literal>< </literal> <replaceable>datatype</replaceable>
<returnvalue>boolean</returnvalue>
</entry>
<entry>Less than</entry>
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ repeat('Pg', 4) <returnvalue>PgPgPgPg</returnvalue>
<row>
<entry>
- <replaceable>datatype</replaceable> <literal>></literal> <replaceable>datatype</replaceable>
+ <replaceable>datatype</replaceable> <literal>> </literal> <replaceable>datatype</replaceable>
<returnvalue>boolean</returnvalue>
</entry>
<entry>Greater than</entry>
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ repeat('Pg', 4) <returnvalue>PgPgPgPg</returnvalue>
<row>
<entry>
- <replaceable>datatype</replaceable> <literal>=</literal> <replaceable>datatype</replaceable>
+ <replaceable>datatype</replaceable> <literal>= </literal> <replaceable>datatype</replaceable>
<returnvalue>boolean</returnvalue>
</entry>
<entry>Equal</entry>
