Jeremy Morton <postg...@game-point.net> writes: > Surely the fact that you'll lose data if you try to store a common > .NET datatype with any kind of ORM (eg. EF, which is pretty popular) > right now, using "the world's most advanced open source relational > database", is reason enough to support it?
If the ORM somehow prevents you from using timestamptz, that's a bug in the ORM. If it doesn't, the above is just a hysterical claim with no factual foundation. regards, tom lane