On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 6:12 PM Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 5:20 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 4:14 PM Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +#define SizeOfTransactionId (sizeof(TransactionId) + sizeof(char))
> > > This looks wrong. We should change the name of this Macro or we can
> > > add the 1 byte directly in HEADER_SCRATCH_SIZE and some comments.
> >
> > I think this is in sync with below code (SizeOfXlogOrigin), SO doen't
> > make much sense to add different terminology no?
> > #define SizeOfXlogOrigin (sizeof(RepOriginId) + sizeof(char))
> > +#define SizeOfTransactionId (sizeof(TransactionId) + sizeof(char))
> >
> In that case, we can rename this, for example, SizeOfXLogTransactionId.
Make sense.
>
> Some review comments from 0002-Issue-individual-*.path,
>
> +void
> +ReorderBufferAddInvalidation(ReorderBuffer *rb, TransactionId xid,
> + XLogRecPtr lsn, int nmsgs,
> + SharedInvalidationMessage *msgs)
> +{
> + MemoryContext oldcontext;
> + ReorderBufferChange *change;
> +
> + /* XXX Should we even write invalidations without valid XID? */
> + if (xid == InvalidTransactionId)
> + return;
> +
> + Assert(xid != InvalidTransactionId);
>
> It seems we don't call the function if xid is not valid. In fact,
>
> @@ -281,6 +281,24 @@ DecodeXactOp(LogicalDecodingContext *ctx,
> XLogRecordBuffer *buf)
> }
> case XLOG_XACT_ASSIGNMENT:
> break;
> + case XLOG_XACT_INVALIDATIONS:
> + {
> + TransactionId xid;
> + xl_xact_invalidations *invals;
> +
> + xid = XLogRecGetXid(r);
> + invals = (xl_xact_invalidations *) XLogRecGetData(r);
> +
> + if (!TransactionIdIsValid(xid))
> + break;
> +
> + ReorderBufferAddInvalidation(reorder, xid, buf->origptr,
> + invals->nmsgs, invals->msgs);
>
> Why should we insert an WAL record for such cases?
I think we can avoid this. I will analyze and send update in my next patch.
>
> + * When wal_level=logical, write invalidations into WAL at each command end
> to
> + * support the decoding of the in-progress transaction. As of now it was
> + * enough to log invalidation only at commit because we are only decoding
> the
> + * transaction at the commit time. We only need to log the catalog cache
> and
> + * relcache invalidation. There can not be any active MVCC scan in logical
> + * decoding so we don't need to log the snapshot invalidation.
> The alignment is not right.
Will fix.
> /*
> * CommandEndInvalidationMessages
> - * Process queued-up invalidation messages at end of one command
> - * in a transaction.
> + * Process queued-up invalidation messages at end of one command
> + * in a transaction.
> Looks unnecessary changes.
Will fix.
>
> * Note:
> - * This should be called during CommandCounterIncrement(),
> - * after we have advanced the command ID.
> + * This should be called during CommandCounterIncrement(),
> + * after we have advanced the command ID.
> */
> Looks unnecessary changes.
Will fix.
> if (transInvalInfo == NULL)
> - return;
> + return;
> Looks unnecessary changes.
>
> + /* prepare record */
> + memset(&xlrec, 0, sizeof(xlrec));
> We should use MinSizeOfXactInvalidations, no?
Right.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
