On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:15 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > When there is a backup_manifest in the database cluster, it's included in > the backup even when --no-manifest is specified. ISTM that this is problematic > because the backup_manifest is obviously not valid for the backup. > So, isn't it better to always exclude the *existing* backup_manifest in the > cluster from the backup, like backup_label/tablespace_map? Patch attached. > > Also I found the typo in the document. Patch attached.
Both patches look good. The second one is definitely a mistake on my part, and the first one seems like a totally reasonable change. Thanks! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
