James Coleman <jtc...@gmail.com> writes: > Fair enough. Unsure if Tomas is still online to comment and/or push, > but reverting SORT_TYPE_STILL_IN_PROGRESS back to 0 works for me as an > initial fix.
I'm guessing he went to bed, so I'll push a fix in a moment.
The patch has survived enough test cycles here now to make me
moderately confident that it fixes the issue.
regards, tom lane
