> > we have it, we can start thinking of patching the main part of the docs > to make reference to it by using <glossterm> in key spots. Right now > the glossary links to itself, but it makes lots of sense to have other > places point to it. >
I have some ideas about how to patch the main docs, but will leave those to a separate thread. > * I commented out the definition of "sequence", which seemed to go into > excessive detail. Let's have a more concise definition? > That one's my fault. > > Patches for these omissions, and other contributions, welcome. > Thanks for all your work on this!
