Hello. At Mon, 23 Mar 2020 18:38:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote in > Patch applied to master, thanks.
The patch (8e8a0becb3) named archiver process as just "archiver". On the other hand the discussion in the thread [1] was going to name the process as "WAL/wal archiver". As all other processes related to WAL are named as walreceiver, walsender, walwriter, wouldn't we name the process like "wal archiver"? [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200319195410.icib45bbgjwqb...@alap3.anarazel.de regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
