> On 16 Mar 2020, at 17:12, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Still, I think the number of people who'd get bit by that could be > counted without running out of fingers, while it seems quite likely > that many people will soon need to build our back branches on > platforms that won't have xml2-config.
I agree with this assessment. > So I'm now leaning to "back-patch and make sure to mention this in > the next release notes". Barring objections, I'll do that soon. None from me. > I don't have a problem with s/libxml/libxml2/ in the running text > (without changing the switch name). +1 > Can't get too excited about > <productname> though. I think we've only consistently applied > that tag to PostgreSQL itself. Fair enough. Looking at a random sample it seems we use a bit of a mix of nothing, <application /> and <productname /> (the latter ones being more or less equal in DocBook IIRC) to mark up externals. cheers ./daniel
