Hugh McMaster <hugh.mcmas...@outlook.com> writes:
> The question is really whether we want to maintain a fallback to
> xml2-config. To give more context, I gave a more detailed assessment of the
> situation in an earlier email to this list. (Personally, I don’t think we
> should.)

I think that that is not optional.  We try to maintain portability
to old systems as well as new.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to