Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> Thanks for the computations with big-endian! I would have just gone
> down to the 8kB page for the expected results by seeing three other
> tests blowing up, but no objection to what you have here either. I
> have checked the computations with little-endian from your patch and
> these are correct.
After thinking more I concluded that the extra expected files would
just be a waste of tarball space, at least till such time as we make
a push to fix all the regression tests to be blocksize-independent.
Pushed it with just the 8K files.
regards, tom lane
