On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 01:46:43PM -0500, David Steele wrote: > Nice! Looks like I was wrong about the checksums being the same on le/be > systems for repeated byte values. On closer inspection it looks like >> 17 > at least ensures this will not be true.
Thanks for the computations with big-endian! I would have just gone down to the 8kB page for the expected results by seeing three other tests blowing up, but no objection to what you have here either. I have checked the computations with little-endian from your patch and these are correct. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
