Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 04:45:51PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Yeah, that works out very nicely: there's now only one place besides >> tupmacs.h that needs a new #include. >> I did a little more polishing, and consider the attached committable, >> unless anyone has objections.
> Nice. I have looked at the patch and it seems to me that no spots
> have been missed.
Pushed, thanks for reviewing.
regards, tom lane
