Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2020-Mar-03, Tom Lane wrote: >> I realized that a possible compromise position is to have tupmacs.h >> include pg_type_d.h, not the whole pg_type.h header, thus dodging the >> indirect inclusions. That still brings in the type-OID macros, but >> it's a lot less header scope creep than I was first fearing.
> WFM.
OK, I'll look harder at doing it that way.
regards, tom lane
