On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:51 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 11:39 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have performed cost delay testing on the latest test(I have used > same script as attahced in [1] and [2]. > vacuum_cost_delay = 10 > vacuum_cost_limit = 2000 > > Observation: As we have concluded earlier, the delay time is in sync > with the I/O performed by the worker > and the total delay (heap + index) is almost the same as the > non-parallel operation. >
Thanks for doing this test again. In the attached patch, I have addressed all the comments and modified a few comments. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v50-0001-Allow-vacuum-command-to-process-indexes-in-parallel.patch
Description: Binary data
