On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:01 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > For combination of VACUUM command options, although parallel vacuum is > > enabled by default and VACUUM FULL doesn't support it yet, 'VACUUM > > (FULL)' would work. On the other hand 'VACUUM (FULL, PARALLEL)' and > > 'VACUUM(FULL, PARALLEL 1)' would not work with error. And I think it > > is better if 'VACUUM (FULL, PARALLEL 0)' also work but I'd like to > > hear opinions. > >
On again thinking about whether we should allow VACUUM (FULL, PARALLEL 0) case, I am not sure, so, for now, the patch [1] is throwing error for that case, but we can modify it if we want. [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1JxWAYTSM4NpTi7Tz%3DsPetbWBWZPpHKxLoEKb%3DgMi%3DGGA%40mail.gmail.com -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
