On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 11:31 AM Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.saw...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 15:27, Masahiko Sawada > <masahiko.saw...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > > I just felt it's not intuitive that specifying parallel degree to 0 > > means to disable parallel vacuum. But since majority of hackers seem > > to agree with this syntax I'm not going to insist on that any further. > > > > Okay I'm going to go with enabling parallel vacuum by default and > disabling it by specifying PARALLEL 0. >
Sounds fine to me. However, I have already started updating the patch for that. I shall post the new version today or tomorrow. Is that fine with you? > For combination of VACUUM command options, although parallel vacuum is > enabled by default and VACUUM FULL doesn't support it yet, 'VACUUM > (FULL)' would work. On the other hand 'VACUUM (FULL, PARALLEL)' and > 'VACUUM(FULL, PARALLEL 1)' would not work with error. And I think it > is better if 'VACUUM (FULL, PARALLEL 0)' also work but I'd like to > hear opinions. > I agree with all these points. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
