On 2019-Dec-20, Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 2019-Dec-20, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> The patch has been committed once as of e788bd9, then reverted as of > >> 9555cc8 because it had a couple of fundamental issues and many people > >> were not happy with it. > > > Hmm, should we mark the commitfest entry as rejected then? Having it be > > marked committed seems pretty confusing. The next version of the patch > > would have its own CF entry, I presume. > > RWF seems appropriate. We haven't rejected the concept altogether, > AFAICT.
Fair enough. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
