Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-Dec-20, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> The patch has been committed once as of e788bd9, then reverted as of
>> 9555cc8 because it had a couple of fundamental issues and many people
>> were not happy with it.
> Hmm, should we mark the commitfest entry as rejected then? Having it be
> marked committed seems pretty confusing. The next version of the patch
> would have its own CF entry, I presume.
RWF seems appropriate. We haven't rejected the concept altogether,
AFAICT.
regards, tom lane
