On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 14:38, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 12:02:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > I don't think it'd be a great idea to change parallel_schedule like > > that. Independently adding test scripts to the same parallel batch > > probably won't end well: you might end up over the concurrency limit, > > or the scripts might conflict through sharing table names or the like. > > So I'd rather see that there's a conflict to worry about. > > > > Anyway, merge conflicts there aren't so common IME. > > FWIW, I was not referring to the schedule files here, just to REGRESS > and ISOLATION in the modules' Makefiles. If you think that's not > worth doing it, let's drop my suggestion then. > --
I found some inconsistency in alphabetical order in src/backend/tsearch/Makefile, src/backend/utils/Makefile and src/pl/plpython/Makefile files. Attached patch is fixing those order related inconsistency. Thanks and Regards Mahendra Thalor EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Fixed_backend_folder_makefiles_v1.patch
Description: Binary data
