Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 02:47:55PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: >> Pushed a patch going with the former. Let's see what the buildfarm >> says...
> Thanks Andres. On a rather related note, would it make sense to do > the same for regression and isolation tests in our in-core modules? I don't think it'd be a great idea to change parallel_schedule like that. Independently adding test scripts to the same parallel batch probably won't end well: you might end up over the concurrency limit, or the scripts might conflict through sharing table names or the like. So I'd rather see that there's a conflict to worry about. Anyway, merge conflicts there aren't so common IME. regards, tom lane