Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> About clear_options, my take is to remove the check on HEAD, and to
> apply Daniel's patch on *all* stable branches because I think that we
> should not break the business that happened with NetBSD 5 on already
> released branches. Does that sound good?
OK, re-reading the thread, I see the point --- old NetBSD has a weird
OpenSSL version that this would break. OK, let's stay compatible
with that on the back branches. So, your patch on HEAD and Daniel's
in the back branches is the right thing. Please push.
(Note: I didn't actually test Daniel's patch or read it closely ---
it looks like about the right thing, but please double check.)
regards, tom lane
