On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 7:11 PM Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.saw...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 11:57, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I think it is probably because this part of the code doesn't consider > > PARALLEL_VACUUM_DISABLE_LEADER_PARTICIPATION. I think if we want we > > can change it but I am slightly nervous about the code complexity this > > will bring but maybe that is fine. > > Right. I'll try to change so that. >
I am thinking that as PARALLEL_VACUUM_DISABLE_LEADER_PARTICIPATION is a debugging/testing facility, we should ideally separate this out from the main patch. BTW, I am hacking/reviewing the patch further, so request you to wait for a few day's time before we do anything in this regard. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
