On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 11:26:40 +0900 (JST) Tatsuo Ishii <is...@sraoss.co.jp> wrote:
> > Note that this is the last patch in the series of IVM patches: now we > > would like focus on blushing up the patches, rather than adding new > > SQL support to IVM, so that the patch is merged into PostgreSQL 13 > > (hopefully). We are very welcome reviews, comments on the patch. > > > > BTW, the SGML docs in the patch is very poor at this point. I am going > > to add more descriptions to the doc. > > As promised, I have created the doc (CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW manual) > patch. - because the triggers will be invoked. + because the triggers will be invoked. We call this form of materialized + view as "Incremantal materialized View Maintenance" (IVM). This part seems incorrect to me. Incremental (materialized) View Maintenance (IVM) is a way to maintain materialized views and is not a word to refer views to be maintained. However, it would be useful if there is a term referring views which can be maintained using IVM. Off the top of my head, we can call this Incrementally Maintainable Views (= IMVs), but this might cofusable with IVM, so I'll think about that a little more.... Regards, Yugo Nagata > > Best regards, > -- > Tatsuo Ishii > SRA OSS, Inc. Japan > English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php > Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Yugo Nagata <nag...@sraoss.co.jp>
