> On 19/11/2019, at 5:05 PM, Gareth Palmer <gar...@internetnz.net.nz> wrote: >> >> Since nobody has objected to this, I'm supposing that there's general >> consensus that that design sketch is OK, and we can move on to critiquing >> implementation details. I took a look, and didn't like much of what I saw.
Attached is an updated patch with for_locking_clause added, test-cases re-use existing tables and the comments and documentation have been expanded. >> I'm setting this back to Waiting on Author.
insert-set-v4.patch
Description: Binary data
