Hi Michael-san, On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 9:10 AM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 06:40:36PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 5:28 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi > > <horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> At Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:20:07 +0900, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fuj...@gmail.com> > >> wrote in > >>> Only two people complaining about the wording? Considering as well > > That's like.. Half the folks participating to this thread ;)
Right... > >>> that we use that wording in the docs and there were no complains about > >>> that IIRC, I don't feel a need to change that, TBH. > >> But the most > >> significant point in the previous mail is using "foreign tables using > >> postgres_fdw" instead of "postgres_fdw foreign tables". > > > > OK, but as I said above, I don't feel the need to change that. How > > about leaving it for another patch to improve the wording in that > > message and/or the documentation if we really need to do it. > > Fine by me. If I were to put a number on that, I would be around +-0, > so I don't have an actual objection with your point of view either. OK, pushed as-is. Thanks for reviewing! Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
