Hi, On 2019-11-04 11:30:23 +0000, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > > > ilm...@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=) writes: > >> I just noticed that when contrib/seg was converted to V1 calling > >> convention (commit 389bb2818f4), the PG_GETARG_SEG_P() macro got defined > >> in terms of PG_GETARG_POINTER(). But it itself calls DatumGetPointer(), > >> so shouldn't it be using PG_GETARG_DATUM()? > > > > Yup, I agree. Pushed. > > Thanks!
Thanks both of you. - Andres
