Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > ilm...@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari =?utf-8?Q?Manns=C3=A5ker?=) writes: >> I just noticed that when contrib/seg was converted to V1 calling >> convention (commit 389bb2818f4), the PG_GETARG_SEG_P() macro got defined >> in terms of PG_GETARG_POINTER(). But it itself calls DatumGetPointer(), >> so shouldn't it be using PG_GETARG_DATUM()? > > Yup, I agree. Pushed.
Thanks! > regards, tom lane - ilmari -- "The surreality of the universe tends towards a maximum" -- Skud's Law "Never formulate a law or axiom that you're not prepared to live with the consequences of." -- Skud's Meta-Law
