>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
Tom> Hm. transformRuleStmt already does special-case utility statements Tom> to some extent, so my inclination would be to make it do more of Tom> that. However, it looks like that might end up with rather Tom> spaghetti-ish code, as that function is kind of messy already. Tom> Or we could abandon the notion of adding the assertion. I don't Tom> know how much work it's worth. Fixing transformRuleStmt just pushes the issue along another step: InsertRule wants to do recordDependencyOnExpr on the rule actions, which just does find_expr_references_walker. I'm going to leave the assertion out for now and put in a comment for future reference. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
