On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:14:16PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Mostly, because I think they're going to cause trouble. Adding a > parameter in the middle of the list may cause trouble for third-party > users of TestLib. I propose that we make the routines a bit smarter to > cope with the API change: use named parameters instead. And in order to > do that without having to change existing users of command_check, make > it so that the routine checks whether the parameter is a hashref, and > behave differently. So when called as in the existing callsites (five > scalar parameters) it behaves as currently.
+1. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
