st 11. 9. 2019 v 7:45 odesÃlatel Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> napsal:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:09 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > The current example shows the usage of looping in plpgsql, so as such > > there is no correctness issue, but OTOH there is no harm in updating > > the example as proposed by Ian Barwick. Does anyone else see any > > problem with this idea? If we agree to proceed with this update, it > > might be better to backpatch it for the sake of consistency though I > > am not sure about that. > > > > While checking the patch in back-branches, I noticed that it doesn't > get applied to 9.4 due to the way the example forms the string. I > have done the required changes for 9.4 as well and attached is the > result. > > Is question if for this queries should not be used some from information_schema instead direct access to pg_catalog. But I looked now, and we don't see materialized views in information_schema - what is probably bug. Pavel > Ian, if possible, can you once check the patch for 9.4? > > -- > With Regards, > Amit Kapila. > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com >
