On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:09 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The current example shows the usage of looping in plpgsql, so as such > there is no correctness issue, but OTOH there is no harm in updating > the example as proposed by Ian Barwick. Does anyone else see any > problem with this idea? If we agree to proceed with this update, it > might be better to backpatch it for the sake of consistency though I > am not sure about that. >
While checking the patch in back-branches, I noticed that it doesn't get applied to 9.4 due to the way the example forms the string. I have done the required changes for 9.4 as well and attached is the result. Ian, if possible, can you once check the patch for 9.4? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
0001-Doc-Update-PL-pgSQL-sample-function-in-plpgsql.sgml.patch
Description: Binary data
0001-94-Doc-Update-PL-pgSQL-sample-function-in-plpgsql.sgml.patch
Description: Binary data
