Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> I think that it is a good idea to add in subdircheck an extra path to
> check after TAP tests and run optionally these on top of the normal
> regression tests. I have a couple of comments.
> Shouldn't we check after TAP_TESTS in the Makefile?
Yeah, perhaps, but I wasn't sure about how to do that easily.
Feel free to add it ...
> There is an argument to also check after isolation tests and run
> them.
Hm, yeah, if there are any such tests in those directories.
> The glob() part is a good idea in itself I think. Why not
> back-patching it? I could double-check it as well.
The whole thing should be back-patched into branches that have
any affected tests. (But, please, not till after beta4 is
tagged.)
regards, tom lane
